Today's dumbest quackery

The Oak Ridge Associated Universities' Health Physics Historical Instrumentation Museum has a marvellous online collection of Radioactive Quack Cures.

I was already familiar with radioactive water jugs, the most famous line of which was the "Revigator", from Theodore Gray's Periodic Table Table site. He's got a Revigator, which he was alarmed to note is still quite hot even now, about eighty years after it was made and lined with the uranium ore whose decay contributed "healthful" radon to the water inside.

There were plenty of other allegedly radioactive medicines and devices on the market not long after the discovery of radium. "Radium" was used as a pretty generic term for anything radioactive in the quack market, and it took over the "science magic" medical role previously occupied by electricity. But this definitely wasn't a change for the better. Most of the electrical quack devices, then and now, were at least harmless. The radioactive ones often very definitely weren't.

If you were lucky, there was no real "radium" in the tablets, water jug or pillow you bought. If you weren't, there was.

The thing that blew my mind about the Oak Ridge Universities site, though, is the revelation that radioactive quack devices are still being made!

We're not talking about brachytherapy devices here. Those are genuine and useful, though hardly a mass market product.

No, these are good old fashioned allegedly-radioactive things that you're meant to affix to your person, or apply to food or drink (or cigarettes!), to charge yourself up with those friendly little cartoon atoms from the '50s educational films.

It boggles my mind that anybody today would think that exposing yourself to significant ionising radiation could possibly be the sort of "general tonic" that's the hallmark of so much quackery ("general tonic" has been replaced by "strengthens the immune system", but the principle remains the same).

But here the darn things are.

Hot pottery, limb-soothing fabric, water treatment doodads... oh, and naturally a thing to make your car run better.

Almost all of the modern quack products, even more bizarrely, come from Japan. If you asked me to name the one place in the world where radiation wouldn't be believed to be healthful, I think I'd probably go for the Ukraine before Japan, but it's a close-run bloody thing.

I mean... what?

The other distinguishing feature of modern ionising radiation quackery, fortunately, is that these devices are definitely much less harmful than the worst of the old ones, and probably barely radioactive at all. The days of radon bulbs for your soda syphon are well past.

The modern products all just seem to be allegedly doped with a bit of thorium, a weak alpha-emitter that does indeed have radium and radon as decay products, but is really only worth worrying about if you're eating or breathing it.

Thorium-doped gas mantles for camping lanterns are still on sale in most countries, and they're about a zillion times less dangerous than whatever mode of transport you use to get to your camp site.

Still and all, though, the very existence of these products depresses me. Yes, I know about all of those surveys where 80% of respondents think the sun orbits the earth, and the popularity of Creationism, homeopathy and "detoxification" has also not escaped my notice.

I even know that some of the customers of these quacks may have formed a genuine, informed opinion against the linear no-threshold model, and thus believe for at least somewhat rational reasons that a slightly above-background radiation dose may be good for them.

But still.

Ionising radiation?

Seriously?

(See also: Can you make a nuclear explosion with your bare hands?)

Today's spamtertainment

Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:40:09 +0000
From: "Kiite Karl Igho"
Subject: Interested Supplier Needed

Interested Supplier Needed

Hi How you doing... In respect to your Add which i searched via google.. I'm interested in it .. what is the present Condition. The products are to be Supplied to the Government of Bangledash. Pls Quote Best price. We need Office Material. We have been Given a quota to Supply Office Equipment. And total price must not Exceed 3.9 Mission USD. Pls, We will be glad if you don't sell kindly forward our message to anyone you know is in Such Business.

Thanks and Hope to read from you Soon.

Kiite Doris Karl
WInTEch Sales
singwitme02@netzero.net
www.wintechsaleshome.1hwy.com
wintechsaleshome@netzero.net

"3.9 Mission USD" is pretty good, but "the Government of Bangledash" is just fantastic.

Well played, credit-card scammer whose name is alleged to contain at least the words "Kiite" and "Karl"! Well played!

Crimes Against Graphing

Not the Laffer Curve

Here's a demolition, if any were needed, of this outrageous graph. Anybody with the slightest comprehension of what a graph with data points and a best-fit line ought to look like can see that it's nonsense, and yet the Wall Street Journal's ever-reliable editorial page used it to try to argue (in brief) that tax cuts pay for themselves (for that sort of thing is the Holy Writ of the WSJ editorial writers).

(Oh, and it turns out that they didn't even put the Norway "outlier" in the right place. It should actually be in the same blob as the rest of the data points.)

The graph reminded me inescapably of...

Electron Band Structure In Germanium, My Ass

...that classic of scientific literature, Electron Band Structure In Germanium, My Ass.

The difference, of course, is that the WSJ are ignoring the actual data and just preaching their Laffer Curve gospel, while Lucas Kovar was doing his darndest to make an experiment work when it just bloody wouldn't. He then wrote up his results with, under the circumstances, great tact and restraint.

Allow me to conclude with my own favourite fancy graph.

Fancy graph

The data points - universally applicable, I think you'll find - are my own. The decoration was shamelessly scanned from The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, which is a much more entertaining, and beautiful, book than you might at first expect.

For more on silly graphs, see my old piece about thermal goop.

STOP PRESS: Underpaid computer store workers are not very trustworthy!

This Consumerist piece about Why Geeks Steal Porn From Your Computer (When They're Meant To Be Fixing It, If They Get A Chance), is both informative and entertaining.

Let me tell you right now that if I were 21 again and working in some dead-end computer store McJob, I too would be rifling through the files of any user who needed our help to install iTunes. Anybody who is even marginally surprised about this would probably be horrified to see the contents of the back-room bulletin board of the average one-hour-photo place before the advent of the affordable digital camera.

There are some good tips in the Consumerist piece, but I disagree with the assertion that "drive encryption on your home computer is worthless". There are many easy-to-use encryption systems which provide data security that'll probably defeat the National Security Agency, never mind some dude in a pot-leaf T-shirt. If you just use Windows EFS and hand your password to the computer store along with the PC then they can of course access your data (and ordinary users who use EFS often lose all of their data as a result...), but there are other very fine options for people who just want to encrypt their accounting data, passwords and pr0n.

Hell, just putting that stuff in a Zip file with a ten character password'll probably do the job. Standard Zip encryption isn't very secure compared with many other schemes, but it's still often not practically attackable from any normal human's point of view. If the password's moderately long and not a dictionary word, and the attacker doesn't already have a copy of some of the data in the archive (giving the option of a "known plaintext" attack, which is the major weakness of standard Zip encryption), then a brute force attack is likely to take a very long time indeed. Even refined brute force attacks are likely to take centuries on current hardware.

Learning how to use encryption software is a good step towards learning how to use the rest of your computer like a "pro" as well. Before you know it, you won't have to hand your computer over to Super Excellent Computer Store's Data Commandoes just because you can't get rid of some crapware.

This just in: Laws o' physics still unbroken

Whaddaya know - another compression scheme that violates rules of information theory has turned out to be a great big scam. The only part of this that surprises me is that I'd never previously heard of this Brent Kovar and his particular take on the broadband-down-a-thin-straw idea.

(For more shenanigans of this sort, check out the last letter in this column.)

"Dear $FIRSTNAME..."

It's not often that you get spam with this sort of clarity:

From: "Hayes, Bryan"
To: dan@dansdata.com
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 03:08:14 -0500
Subject: Message subject

Message subject

%CUSTOM_CONTENT

%CUSTOM_BIZLINK

Bryan Hayes

%CUSTOM_QUOTE

Regrettably, there was no X-Mailer line with the name of a spamming program in it, so we don't get to know (possibly after some detective work) with what software "Brian" failed to fill in the form before clicking the "Send 100,000,000 e-mails" button.

(The sending server was, according to ancient tradition, a Chinanet IP address.)

I look forward with enthusiasm to the reduction in spam bandwidth consumption that'll occur when we all start getting tiny little messages that just say "%NIGERIAN_SCAM" or "%DICK_PILLS" or "%BUY_SOME_STOCK" rather than the informationally equivalent uncompressed versions.

Take care of the pennies...

Drop shipping comes to the common man. (Via.)

Drop shipping, where A buys a product from B and B arranges for C, the actual source of the product, to send it directly to A, is a normal business practice for many online retailers. They may keep substantial stock of lots of mainstream items on hand, but their catalogue may also include expensive low-volume items that they don't want to sit and go stale in their warehouse.

A computer dealer may get hundreds of orders a week for hard drives and motherboards and CPUs, for instance, but only sell one video projector a fortnight. If they get eight projectors in stock and have only sold two when a newer, better, cheaper model comes out, they're boned. Better to not offer stuff like that for sale at all.

If the local distributor of that video projector has their act together, though, the retailer can just act like an order processor as far as that product goes, and get the distributor to send the product directly to the customer whenever someone orders one. This can also cause problems, of course, but as long as the retailer obeys the relevant consumer protection laws - just because they never even saw the product they just sold doesn't exonerate them from having to make things right if the thing turns up broken - everybody can, and usually does, end up happy.

So that's drop shipping as it applies to $5000 video projectors. This is drop shipping as it applies to 75 cent books.

And here's drop shipping for people who don't want to keep their eBay account much longer.

EBay is also absolutely jam-packed with people selling sooper sekrit lists of incredible low-priced drop shipping sources. You know - those special companies that sell things really cheaply to Masons, and Jews, and, uh, maybe the homos too - and to you, once you've bought the list! Makes perfect sense!

Some of those outfits are just variants on the multilevel marketing scam where suckers are tricked into paying for little more than the privilege of tricking other people into paying for little more than the privilege of tricking, et cetera.

Others, while they're very good at taking money from fresh-faced new drop shipping entrepreneurs, aren't so good at ever actually sending anything to a customer.

(I bet this post'll attract some really choice Google ads.)

Playing the triangle

In the olden days, you used to get spam from people running link farms (groups of many-paged sites full of useless "directory" pages with hundreds of links to each other), telling you that they'd added a link to your site from one of their dreadful pages and unless you linked back, they'd DELETE THE LINK OMG.

Back in the mists of time this may actually have worked - if, by "worked", you mean "artificially inflated the value of these sites so their worthless pollution floated up into people's search results and they got some ad-viewing traffic".

It doesn't work any more, though. Anybody who joins in these scams by linking back now connects themselves to the "bad neighbourhood" mojo that's applied to all known link farms by the search engines. This achieves the exact opposite of the ranking-boosting traffic bonanza promised by the spammers.

So, nowadays, the spammers have moved on to trapezoidal triangular linking.

You used to get spam from someone who runs www.creativeusesforsnot.com and is apparently convinced that some random page on your site where the word "snot" appears is a perfect match for his very important directory of links, but not if you don't link back. Now, you get spam from the same guy, except he's telling you that if you link to creativeusesforsnot.com, he'll link to you from elephant-toenail-trimmers.com.

Because the search engines don't know his two sites are connected, all of these links look like perfectly kosher "one way" propositions, and everybody wins. Eh? Buddy? Buddy buddy buddy?

A few of these e-mails a day have been leaking through to me. Here's a typically moronic example:

From: "Shamim"
To:
Subject: Link Exchange Request
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:30:44 +0530

Dear Webmaster

I handle online marketing for my client's site http://www.petwellbeing.com/dog-kidney-disease-p91.cfm

As you all know about the Google's new algorithym and the improtance of oneway linking. I am also looking for triangular linking ( New Virsion of Oneway linking ) to increase the linkpopularity of my site as well the ranking in major search engines.

I will also add your site on to my directory http://www.rainforests.com.au/ within24 hours of your positive reply.

please add my site at least page rank(2) page.

I request you to do have a look on to my website and add it on your website and reply me with your site's details.

Here is my linking details :-

URL : http://www.petwellbeing.com/dog-kidney-disease-p91.cfm

Title :Canine Kidney Disease Treatments

Description :Effective natural pet medication for canine kidney disease treatments to reduce irritation and pain.

Link will be added at: http://www.rainforests.com.au/rainforests/Rainforest_Birds.htm
: http://www.petidtags.org/linkmachine/resources/resources.html

You can also paste the code given below :

Canine Kidney Disease Treatments Effective natural pet medication for canine kidney disease treatments to reduce irritation and pain.

Your link will be added on my site within 24 hours. So if you are interested for link exchange with my site please let me know and we can do a better work for our sites.

Thanks and Regards

Shamim

shamim124@gmail.com

There's no connection between the three domains mentioned in this e-mail as far as whois records go (although I was amused to note that the registrant of rainforests.com.au put what appears to be his real Australian Business Number in his registration!), but Google would have to be pretty stupid to be unable to connect them. Google are all about seeing patterns in links, and triangular linking creates repetitive patterns. A links to X, then X links to C. A links to Y, then Y links to C. Et cetera. This sort of thing seldom happens for valid reasons.

Oh, and these guys keep sending out these brain-hurtingly stupid e-mails to zillions of recipients, who then post them to the Web and Usenet, where the world can see the scheme exposed. Sometimes the spammers cut out the middleman here, by spamming mailing-list addresses and getting their messages archived online automatically.

So even if these dorks don't accidentally spam people (or spam-trap addresses...) that actually lead directly to the search engines, they can still be discovered very quickly.

Are they, though?

Well, the root pages for the sites mentioned in the above spam are all still sitting pretty at Google PageRank 4, which is quite good. The sub-pages actually mentioned in the spam are down around PR3, but it's normal for sub-pages on valid sites to have a slightly lower rank than the root page.

When I looked at some sites promoted in previous spams that've been visible online for months - here, for instance - I found that their root pages still had OK PageRanks - well, PR3 at least. More interestingly, the sub-pages that the spam tells people to link inward to are also still doing OK, but the sub-pages that link outward in return are now down on PR0 with the rest of the hoi polloi.

So it does seem that Google is somewhat wise to this scam. If you do what a triangular-link spammer asks you to do, your site's PageRank mojo will indeed contribute to the PageRank of the page you link to, but as soon as Google notices the pattern, the spammer's return-link page will plummet to PR0 and so his link will do you no good.

This isn't an optimal solution, since it means the triangular-link scam will still work just fine for the spammer, if people do what he says. It'd be better if triangular link beneficiaries were being classed as "bad neighbourhoods" just like the old-style link farms.

But if it becomes common knowledge that these schemes are as fishy as they sound, at least fewer people will fall for them.