Snake-oil by phone

A reader (and commenter) writes:

I realize you're probably sick to death of hearing about PFC scams, but this might amuse you anyway: I just got a phone call from a heavily-accented call-center voice purporting to be part of an energy-saving campaign by my electricity provider, Hydro-Quebec. They promised to send me a gadget which I would plug into any outlet and which would reduce my electricity consumption 30-40%.

(Initially I thought it might be a Kill-A-Watt or similar, which I would actually use, or could if my ancient inefficient appliances didn't belong to my landlord.)

When I asked how it worked, they claimed it contained "three special capacitors" and that it reduced some sort of ill-defined stray currents in my wires, and that it would reduce what was read on my electricity meter by the above 30-40%. Initially they gave the impression they were going to just send it to me, which I would have gleefully accepted so that I could dissect it and demonstrate its non-function. But it transpired that they were actually offering me a "great deal" and a "once in a lifetime offer" - yes, those are the words they used - of 50% off on its $400 price.

Once it was clear I wasn't going to get a piece of hardware for skewering, I suddenly found I had better things to do. I called Hydro-Quebec and they know there are people doing this, they had a security department number to hand (which referred me to the Canadian Anti-Fraud Office, which isn't open), but I was kind of surprised to get it at my home number.

Anne

Yes, I am just a little tired of bogus power savers, having written about them here, here, here and here on Dan's Data, and here, here, here, here and here on this blog.

But it bears re-re-re-repeating, here and elsewhere, because people are still selling these things (and removing all doubt in the comments of relevant blog posts...), and innocent people are still buying them. The more frequently this message is repeated, the more of a public service it does:

Magic power savers that're somehow meant to substantially reduce your household (or small business) electricity bill by hazily-described means involving capacitors, power factor or even stranger alleged technology are, without exception, scams. Power factor is a real thing and so is power factor correction, but household and small-business electricity consumers are almost never billed by power factor - spinning-disc electricity meters can't even measure it - and magic one-size-fits-all power-factor-correcting gizmoes don't actually even do what they're supposed to. The components inside these things aren't necessarily even connected. So even if you were billed by power factor, these gadgets would not improve it.

I have, to date, not had the pleasure of some guy with an Indian accent trying to sell me a magic power saver over the phone. Indian dudes ringing the doorbell and trying to get me to change my electricity supplier, yes; phone solicitations for power savers, no.

(The door-to-door guys are probably having a pretty bad time. I presume someone's making out like a bandit hiring Indian kids for a "working holiday" in beautiful Australia, then leaving the unfortunate workers stuck in yet another of those godforsaken semi-scammish door-to-door sales jobs that only pay by commission and have all sorts of outrageous requirements designed to soak up what money the poor bastards do manage to make. The door-to-door electricity guys, here in Australia where the power industry is still well enough regulated that there are no real "scam" providers as far as I know, are kind of like the Kirby vacuum or Cutco knife salespeople, selling a legitimate, if overpriced, product in an unpleasant way. They are, at least, not selling white-van loudspeakers, or fake health insurance to grandmas.)

My household has, however, been enjoying the attentions of another breed of Indian-accent phone-scammers. These guys, invariably identifiable thanks to the distinctive autodialer pause when you pick up the phone, were calling us a couple of times a week, though I think they've been quiet for a little while now. We may have finally persuaded them to stop, or perhaps they got busted. Or, more plausibly, they've submerged and departed for a while to avoid being busted.

Aaaaanyway, these guys usually say they're from Microsoft or something, and tell you there's something terribly wrong with your computer, and you need to go to their Web site and install some malware to fix the problem.

Anne (my Anne, not the Anne at the top of this post) has frequently asked these callers why they do not seek honest employment. The next time I pick up a call from them, I think I'll pretend to be racist.

"Is there, do you know, a single honest man anywhere in India? Clearly the British need to return and take you naughty little children firmly in hand once again. You silly little dusky monkeys, bless your souls, simply cannot grasp the white man's honour, can you? It's really not your fault; you simply cannot tell right from wrong. We blame ourselves, you know. It was foolish of us to trust you, with your tiny, adorable brains, to govern yourselves."

(Suggested background music.)

Just wasting a telephone scammer's time is small potatoes. We must aim, instead, to induce incoherent rage.

Fnord!

From: "freemason illuminati" <noreply@freemason.org>
To: yourorder@fi.org
Reply-To: order@illuminati.umail.net
Subject: fi
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:10:41 +1200

You are receiving this mail in regards of the freemason confraternity of the
whole wide world (FCWWW).

You are moving well in what you are doing but in order to make it easier for
you, we have concluded for you to be a part of us as a member to sign your
life to us and have any thing you need.

Be it any thing in the whole wide world.

You can't refuse us now for it's too late.

Get back to us now for your Illuminati membership Order and also for you to
know more about the ancient ILLUMINATI FORUM and also the Orientation and
goals that we pursue.

Get back to acquire your goal now.

I would appear to not be the only person who is moving well, et cetera. The Freemason Confraternity of the Whole Wide World also seem to be offering a better deal than the LaRouche people.

(Yes, the local LaRouchies continue to e-mail me periodically, unconcerned by their continuing terrible prophetic record, and not inclined to admit any errors.)

Fi.org is registered to someone in Denmark, and rather appropriately www.fi.org currently redirects to shady.dk. But that's just a parked domain now; it looked something like this in 2007. The Internet Archive have numerous copies of fi.org going back as far as 1998, but they all seem to be parked-domain redirectors too.

(I suppose archive.org just didn't know the secret handshake.)

Zero to Kafka in five minutes, or no money back

OK, whippin' up the ol' Business Activity Statement for the first quarter of this year, tum te tum, run the special government BAS-management software and... it tells me I'd better renew my AUSkey certificate before it expires at the end of July.

Bit of an early warning, but OK, fair enough, off we go to the AUSkey site, which I leave open for a while as I enter stuff for my next BAS in the other special software that apparently a few other governments inflict upon their populace. (As is traditional with such things, this program likes to pop up dialog boxes telling you to enter a date for something, when you've entered data in some other field first, and then click on the date field intending to do the thing it is haughtily preventing you from doing until you click "OK".)

A few minutes later, I come back to the AUSkey site and click "login", whereupon it tells me my session has timed out and I have to go back to the home page, which is exactly where I already was.

What session? I don't have a session yet! I haven't logged in!

OK, argh, whatever, I log in again and it tells me I don't have the special AUSkey software which I thought I had but OK, again whatever, click the thing to download the software and... back I go to the home page again.

Go through that loop again until I realise that the site is attempting to tell me via mental telepathy that it does not support Chrome. Try Firefox instead, which to the government's credit does actually work and lo, now I do have the software that I installed whenever I went through this palaver the last time, and it doesn't even seem to need 283 updates since I last used it!

Righto, off we go, let's renew our certificate...

Hang on - there doesn't seem to be an option to do that anywhere.

Gee, could that perhaps be because the AUSkey does not, in fact, ever actually expire?

Why yes, that is the case.

Did the other program really tell me to update my AUSkey?

I quit it and run it again, and it doesn't say shit this time. I could have sworn it said I had to renew my AUSkey certificate but... now I... I just don't know.

You know, part of the reason why I wish Australia didn't have any submarines is that I'm not sure anyone's ever clearly explained what purpose they're expected to serve. (They apparently performed quite well in war games against the USA, which I'm sure will make all the difference if we decide to go to war with America. Or, marginally less crazily, with China, whose attack subs only outnumber ours 59 to six, not counting their entirely insignificant five nuclear ballistic missile submarines.)

Most of the reason, though, is that I don't think an institution that can create a system like this should be be allowed anywhere near explosives.

Give me money or I'll hurt you! My name is, "My Mother-In-Law"!

I have, of late, discovered that titling a blog post "You have money you didn't know about! Give us some of it!", and/or mentioning unclaimed money recovery services in that post, will attract a constant flow of spam-comments.

Spam-comments are aimed at the other 828 posts on this blog (829, counting this one) from time to time, but the unclaimed-money post gets way more than all of the others put together.

(It'll be interesting to see if the spammers now start aiming at this post as well, since I've used some of the same magical scam-attracting words.)

Akismet catches very nearly all of the spam-comments, so they never make it to the actual visible page and all I have to do is occasionally click the "empty" button for the spam-bin in my WordPress control panel. But still they come. Some are for the dodgy financial services you'd expect, but there are also many for other things, like the inevitable pharmacies, knockoff couture and wristwatches and, for some reason, at least one spammer monomaniacally obsessed with coupons for replacement heads for Swiffer floor cleaners.

This comment's an absolute star, though:

PAYPAL DONATE ME NOW OR I WILL HACK YOUR WEBSITE Says:
10 April 2012 at 12:23 am

PAYPAL PAYPAL DONATE ME NOW OR I WILL HACK YOUR WEBSITE- DON'T YOU DARE TO REPORT PAYPAL...

PAYPAL PAYPAL DONATE ME MOTHER PHUCKER NOW OR I WILL HACK YOUR WEBSITE - Scraped Media Pty Ltd MY PAYPAL IS PAYPAL@5t8.com - Scraped Media Pty Ltd - PAYPAL IS support@scrapebox.com Payment Sent to: MY PAYPAL IS support@scrapebox.com...

Akismet caught this one too, but it's so funny that I approved it anyway.

(Actually it's a trackback, not a comment. It purports to be a trackback from a post on donatenoworyourssitegone.com, but that site does not actually exist; the extremely desirable domain name isn't even registered. The trackback was, instead, probably sent from purpose-built comment-spamming software.)

This distinctive wording can be found on a few other pages. In this thread, someone who probably actually does represent Scraped Media says that this is some guy trying to frame them. It's a joe job, in other words; making someone else look bad by spamming ads for your competitors' products, or pretending to be your enemy and making threats, or blowing up your own shop, et cetera.

I wonder if this could actually work, though, and get Scrapebox's PayPal account frozen. A result like that wouldn't really stand out among the world's many dismal tales of PayPal dysfunction.

(To be fair, I did get my money back that one time, but it was because the seller didn't contest my claim.)

Since Scraped Media appear to be, via their ScrapeBox software, in the comment-spam business themselves, in this particular conflict I think it's a damn shame somebody has to win. (And yes, ScrapeBox can fire off fake trackbacks just like this one.)

I'll check back on this in a few weeks, and see who actually ends up doing what to whom.

OK, but does Grandpa's knee ache, too?

A reader writes:

This page (via this page via this page via this page...) says that if it's going to rain, the surface of a parallel-walled cup of strong coffee will be slightly convex, with the bubbles in the middle. If it's not going to rain, the bubbles will be around the edge. Apparently this has something to do with atmospheric pressure. I am skeptical.

Matthew

I'm skeptical, too. I can't imagine how this is supposed to work.

Any ordinary liquid (which is to say, not liquid helium, supercritical carbon dioxide or other such substances not easy to find at the supermarket) has surface tension, which causes it to form a meniscus, a curved surface, when put in a container.

If the molecules of the liquid stick to each other better than they stick to the material the container is made from, the meniscus will be convex, higher in the middle. If the liquid molecules stick to the container material better than to each other, the meniscus will be concave, lower in the middle and higher around the edge.

Water in most kinds of household cup or glass forms a concave meniscus; water in a silicone cup forms a convex one. Coffee behaves much the same, as far as I can tell; foam or crema or whatever could be piled up in different ways, and really strong coffee might be oily enough to give a concave meniscus in almost any container, but that's the extent of the differences as far as I can tell.

Weather is definitely related to atmospheric pressure, and to relative humidity, for that matter. Falling pressure and rising humidity generally indicate a higher probability of rain. But pressure and humidity won't have any effect on the behaviour of a liquid in an open container, unless the pressure is so low that the liquid starts to boil at the ambient temperature. If the liquid is water then it'll evaporate faster when the humidity is low and not at all if the humidity is 100% (or higher).

One thing definitely does affect the distribution of bubbles on top of a cup of coffee, though; it's called a teaspoon. If you stir your coffee round and round, the bubbles will pile up in the middle. If you don't, they'll probably stick to the edges.

I think the bubbles ending up in the middle when the liquid is spinning is analogous to the behaviour of similarly spun flames. If you make an apparatus that can spin candles on a platter or arm while shielding them from the wind of their movement...

MIT Tech TV

...their flames bend inwards. Centrifugal force makes them bend in, not out, for the same reason the undisturbed flames go up, not down; the hot flames are lighter than the air surrounding them. Helium balloons behave the same way, but the rig to demonstrate it is more cumbersome.

(The above is an unusual version of this classic physics demonstration, which is usually done with a two-candle apparatus that looks more like this.)

If the weather-predicting coffee is meant to operate by mystic unknown forces, like the much weirder "storm glass", then of course observing that normal atmospheric pressure variations have no effect on coffee is irrelevant. The burden of proof is on the claimant, though, and this is a pretty extraordinary claim; I'd like to see someone actually test this peculiar alleged phenomenon.


Psycho Science is a regular feature here. Ask me your science questions, and I'll answer them. Probably.

And then commenters will, I hope, correct at least the most obvious flaws in my answer.

My Crackpot Theory of Dental Care

I'm going to let you in on a little secret, here.

I don't use toothpaste.

Ever.

I was turned off the stuff by the dental-health people who came to my school when I was a wee 'un. They told me to brush my teeth with the ghastly gritty super-minty high-fluoride toothpaste they always brought with them, I begged them not to, they made me anyway, I vomited copiously, and that was the end of toothpaste for me.

Heck, for many years I didn't brush my teeth at all.

You may, at this juncture, be imagining the plausible results of this refusal, on my part, to allow society's frivolous protocols to take precedence over my personal values.

My mouth, you will be surmising, must be a steaming, mangrove-covered bayou, occasionally punctuated by by plopping mud-bubbles and shattered, gravestone-like, lichen-encrusted teeth.

I do not blame you for jumping to this conclusion, for it is perfectly reasonable. That was certainly the response of the dentist I visited, for the first time in at least ten years, a while ago.

But, as the dentist and her similarly terrified assistant immediately discovered, my teeth are actually just a bit yellower than the average.

Every one of 'em was there, not a one had a hole in it.

And my breath didn't, and doesn't, smell.

This is because, as that dentist cheerfully confirmed for me after she regained her composure, brushing your teeth is the least effective way of cleaning your mouth.

Brushing your teeth isn't useless, especially if you're thorough about it and do use fluoride toothpaste. But the danger spots in your mouth are between the teeth, where food particles accumulate and feed colonies of bacteria. And if you want sweet breath but only clean your teeth to get it, the similarly-flourishing colonies of bacteria on your tongue will start stinking up your exhalations again as soon as the masking smell of the toothpaste dissipates.

So what dark rituals was I performing, to escape what countless jaunty animated toothbrush mascots have insisted is the inevitable consequence of not scrubbing your teeth with minty froth?

Well, I floss pretty regularly, and also clean properly between my teeth very regularly. I do that now with Piksters "interdental brushes", which are, essentially, tiny tough pipe-cleaners for the gaps between your teeth.

And to avoid smelly breath, I clean the top surface of my tongue, every morning. There are many purpose-made doodads for scraping your tongue; plastic ones cost almost nothing, so you might as well give them a go. I've always found a straight scraper blade to be perfectly adequate, though; I use a little six-inch steel ruler.

Apparently if you use a tiny little scraper it can take three minutes to clean your tongue. My manly metal scraper would have pretty much removed my lower jaw by then. Yes, my taste-buds still work.

(When I stay the night at someone else's house, I have been known to use a butter knife. Not known by them, though, obviously.)

And... that's it. Keep the in-betweens clean, scrape the tongue, job done.

Not one filling, for 35 years.

I didn't avoid dentists because I had good reason to be terrified of them. I just didn't see the need.

And then I started taking a medication that reduces saliva production. And less than a year later...

Busted tooth

...stuff was falling apart.

(That was my lower left first molar. I took the picture with the little USB endoscope which I reviewed some time ago, and which provided a surprising amount of later entertainment. Also, vaguely apropos of this, every kid who's starting to lose their baby teeth should be made aware of what a terrifying monster they now look like under the skin.)

Loss of saliva production is dangerous for teeth. Saliva actively protects teeth, and decay can progress much faster when you run out of spit.

This is part of the recipe for the "meth mouth" phenomenon, which can occur if you use any drug, like marijuana or the far-less-interesting medication that I'm on, which inhibits saliva production. All you have to do is habitually take such a drug, then treat your uncomfortable cotton-mouth with sugary and/or acidic fizzy drinks instead of something like milk or water (sugar-free chewing gum can also be helpful). Your teeth will then be rotting out of your head surprisingly soon. Especially if you also grind your teeth in classic tweaker style, and can think of a million very energetic things to do that are not cleaning said teeth.

Anyway, now it's a few years later again, and I've got a couple of fillings. But only a couple, touch wood.

I brush my teeth now, with one of those fancy super-fast circle-jiggling electric toothbrushes, but I still don't use toothpaste. Everything seems to be going pretty well.

But wait, there's more.

My previous interaction with a dentist, before the mysterious alien-implant thing, had been many years before, when my wisdom teeth were coming through. A bridge of gum-flesh remained over the middle, from the back to the front, of at least of one of them.

This is an absolutely prime spot for gunk to accumulate and start destroying the "new" tooth before it's even finished erupting. The bridge will normally separate on one end as the tooth emerges, if like me you're lucky enough to have a jaw that in clear violation of God's plan actually has room for wisdom teeth. But you'll be left with a little flap of flesh over part of the tooth, and probably also a pocket down the side, which is almost as bad. It's basically impossible to keep these areas constantly clear of nasty-smelling... gunk.

So I'd been making damn sure the rotten-ness didn't have a chance to take hold, by digging and flicking and poking at the area with whatever small pointy object came to hand. The wire in the middle of twist-ties did a dandy job of getting some nice cleansing blood flowing.

I was, and still am, delighted to say that this dentist, also, endorsed and encouraged my bizarre oral-hygiene activities.

("Oh," I hear some of you ask, "on the subject of your hatred of the taste of toothpaste - do you, in far-off Australia, have in addition to your bizarre pink candies the things which we foreigners call 'Spearmint Leaves'?" Why yes, gentle reader, we do. "And do they taste exactly like numerous dental concoctions described as having a 'pleasant mint flavour', which statement is just as much of a... it can't be a lie, it's more of a cruel joke, really... as the similar statements made on cough-medicine bottles?" Yes, they do. "And do Spearmint Leaves, also, make you want to heave?" Yes, indeed they, also, do.)

Interesting Deaths, and the Avoidance Thereof

A while ago, I reviewed a book with a lot of fictional death in it. I didn't like that book much.

Today, a book with a lot of factual death in it. I like this book a lot.

Over The Edge: Death In Grand Canyon, by Michael P. Ghiglieri and Thomas M. Myers, is accurately titled. It chronicles the numerous ways in which people can end, and have ended, their lives in Arizona's Grand Canyon and its environs.

There are a lot of deaths in this book. A lot of deaths. The means of death that sprang first to my mind when I discovered the book existed was people larking around pretending to step off the edge, and then not pretending quite so much. And yes, those people are in there. But so are underprepared hikers, plane crashes, an awful lot of people in boats, and gruelling tales of historical exploration.

Every now and then a tale in Over The Edge ends with someone surviving. But that's really not the way to bet.

Death In Grand Canyon

Absolutely the worst thing about this book is the cover. It clearly depicts a rainbow-farting unicorn plunging to certain doom, so that's good, but it's got that weird "undesigned" look typical of self-published crank-screeds. (And, yes, it's also got Papyrus, again.)

And, while I'm whinging, the editing and proofing isn't everything it might have been. There are occasional typoes, like two different renditions of someone's name, not to mention uninventive prose like "a deadly game of Russian roulette" - as opposed, presumably, to Russian roulette played with a Nerf revolver.

And, if I'm honest, the middle of the book's not as fascinating as the beginning. The middle's where you'll find numerous deaths in modern river-runs, usually because of lousy steering by boatmen, and other stuff that could pretty much happen anywhere - air accidents, freak accidents, (a surprisingly small number of) suicides, and murders.

(I did find an unfortunate interaction between a low-flying helicopter and an environmental sediment-transport study to be blackly hilarious.)

But perhaps I'm being too demanding. People wind up dead at a regular pace throughout the book, which really should be good enough for me. And there's quite a bit of variety; it's not all "If you choose to play a practical joke on your young daughter by pretending, with great theatricality, to fall off the edge of a canyon and hundreds of feet to your death, it is a good idea to make sure that the ledge just below the edge on which you intend to land is not covered with loose pebbles forming a slope at their critical angle of repose."

To extract maximum entertainment from this volume, you may by this point have figured out that you need a somewhat morbid sense of humour. Watching Dad leap off the edge may be a horror beyond imagining for the onlooking mum and kids, but if, like me, your first thought on seeing that the man in question actually did have kids was "darn, not eligible for a Darwin Award, then", you're all set to enjoy the rest of the volume.

All this is not to say that this is one of those schlocky publications aimed at People Who Like Football, and Porno, and Books About War. Over The Edge isn't relentlessly po-faced, but neither is it buckets-of-blood-narrated-by-Jeremy-Clarkson. It does help if, like me, you decided to download the coroner's report linked from here specifically because of the warning about the photos it contains (and then, like me, decided that the term "extensively morselized" made the document a must-read all by itself...), but Over The Edge is really a collection of true stories of people in horrible situations, and the noble, venal, foolish and/or altruistic things they then do.

It also, definitely, has educational value. I now, for instance, know some more of the wonderful panoply of ways in which whitewater can murder you, whether the flow rate is high or low.

High rates give deeper, and possibly also faster, water, which in the case of the Colorado River may be startlingly cold (Over The Edge's co-author thinks this may be because of the Glen Canyon Dam, which releases water from its ice-cold depths, not its warmer surface). Low flow rates are still often plenty to whip your feet out unexpectedly from under you (people keep forgetting that a cubic metre of water weighs a tonne, and even a mere cubic foot of water weighs more than 28 kilograms {62 pounds}...), and they also make rapids much rockier, and thus more likely to break your boat and then your body.

Many of the deaths in Over The Edge are quite improbable. Horsing around on the rim of a canyon, or going for a hike in the heat equipped with a Snickers bar and a 591-millilitre bottle of Dasani (and not even telling anyone you're going...), are both dangerous activities. But people do these sorts of dumb things all the time, and the overwhelming majority of them survive. Often without even having to involve rescue staff (also known as the TNS, or Thwarting Natural Selection, Squad).

Over The Edge can be quite educational, though, in showing you how to avoid taking less obvious risks, even if you're never going to visit the Grand Canyon. Much of the advice is highly applicable to any backcountry adventuring, especially in gully country.

For instance: Yes, lost people really do have a strong tendency to walk in circles, even when they should be able to get their bearings from their surroundings.

Oh, and if you're going out on the water, or just wading into the water, or possibly even just fishing in the water from the shore, WEAR A LIFE JACKET.

And, advice almost as important, if more specialised: If you have a history of sleepwalking, don't camp right next to a river.

(The poor kid starring in that particular story was meant to be camped miles away from the river, but the adult leading the trip got the group stranded next to the river for the night, when they got there too late and the one flashlight the adult brought didn't work.)

You also, it turns out, can't count on arid country having the traditional desert climate where it's hot during the day and freezing cold at night. The Canyon manages to stay hot right through the night! Enjoy!

And young, fit people - especially children - can become severely dehydrated while they're still running around and looking chirpy enough. Then they suddenly crash, and five minutes later their heart is still beating, but there's windblown sand accumulating on their unblinking eyes.

And, remember, kids: Just Say No to jimsonweed. Seriously.

And then there are the historic stories, featuring numerous explorers who figured that God would not have made a place so dismal and lethal as this without putting at least one damn good vein of silver in there somewhere.

(This reminds me of the fact that for a lot of people in the olden days, forests, canyons and mountains were not "beautiful". Ships, bridges, castles, cathedrals and geometrically landscaped gardens were beautiful. It was only when we started to have the luxury of not having to look at nature all the time that we started finding it appealing.)

The central theme of this book is that wilderness does still exist, and does not automatically come with handrails and warning signs.

I'm quite close to some wilderness myself. I live in Katoomba, New South Wales, and my house is a lazy ten-minute walk from Echo Point. At Echo Point itself and most of the cliff walks around it, you do get a pretty good supply of handrails and warning signs, and people almost never die, except occasionally on purpose.

Tromp on down the Giant Stairway into the rainforest-y valley, though, and things change. The valley barely qualifies as a pothole compared with the Grand Canyon, and most tourists just toddle along the wood-paved walkways and catch a cable car back up. But if you strike out south you're instantly in a heavily-forested National Park. People can and do get life-threateningly lost down there, even after so little wandering that if the land were magically flattened they could walk to a place that serves a really good latte in about an hour.

I thought Over The Edge would just be morbid, shading to morbidly-hilarious, which would be good enough for me. But it isn't. Yes, it's basically just a long list of people who died, almost died and/or really should have died (serious Survival Bonus Points, for example, go to the immobilised-by-injury woman who managed to catch the attention of people hundreds of feet away by shouting, even though she had two collapsed lungs...). But it's frequently fascinating.

And, of course, if you're actually going to the Grand Canyon, to do anything more than stand 30 yards from the edge under a parasol, there is no better book to read beforehand. And to be seen reading while you're there.

Recommended.

(Buy it at Amazon, and I'll get a cut!)

Once again, why not try caustic soda?

A reader writes:

One of the many things wasting space in my brain is that cocaine is commonly cut with baby laxative.

The only evidence I can remember for this is 1980s action movies, though, so I could be wrong.

Presuming they actually do that, or did that... why? Baby laxative? Could you guys not find any cornflour, or something?

Eldon

The idea of cutting a drug - or adulterating-for-profit any number of other products, for that matter - is to bulk it out to increase your income, without making it obvious that you're bulking it out to increase your income.

So you can get away with a little watering-down of booze, or considerably more if you're selling freezing flavourless lager to people who are already drunk. (Whenever it's this easy to run a scam, you can bet on centuries of merciless effort on the part of opposing lawmen. You don't mess with the weights and measures people if you know what's good for you.)

You, presuming you're a seller of illegal drugs, could also get away with mildly moistening marijuana to increase its weight.

But you couldn't get away with mixing all your whiskey half-and-half with water; even if you're the only saloon in a one-horse town, you'll soon be finding rattlesnakes in your bed. A similar trick done with marijuana and oregano is similarly inadvisable.

To the eye, the Expensive Serious White-Powder Drugs all look much the same. If you're shooting a movie and need "heroin" or "cocaine", then glucose powder or bicarbonate of soda or, as you say, flour, could do the job. But they wouldn't pass muster for a second if properly tested - just taste would give away more than very slight cutting of real heroin or cocaine with sugar or bicarb, and non-soluble substances like flour in a drug that's supposed to be cooked up into a liquid or free base may also make themselves obvious before you've gotten away to a safe distance with the customer's money.

What you, the go-getting narcotics entrepreneur who likes his knees unbroken, want instead of these mere visual substitutes is something that looks, feels, tastes, smells and behaves as much as possible like the real thing. Whatever someone does with the drug you're selling, your cutting substance should do too, at least up until the final "actually getting high" test.

Oh, and the cutting substance also needs to be as inexpensive as possible, and preferably also not poisonous.

So this is how we ended up with odd products being used to cut drugs. The famous "baby laxative" is mannitol, a pleasingly harmless substance which probably won't even give a user the runs. You need to swallow tens of grams for it to have that effect; "swallowing" via your nose will presumably work, but you'll need to be someone very big in the advertising industry, or David Bowie in the mid-Seventies, to achieve the necessary volume.

(Freebasing ought to avoid the problem altogether, but has other risks.)

Another weird-but-surprisingly-common drug adulterant is levamisole, a compound whose primary legitimate use is as worming pills for animals and humans. Levamisole looks just like pure cocaine, doesn't show up in quick-and-dirty adulterant-detecting tests, and may be a little bit toxic to heavy users, but is largely harmless. It's therefore an immensely popular cocaine-cutting agent.

There are also old-wives'-tale drug adulterants. They're putting heroin in the marijuana these days, you know! And in ecstasy, too!

No, they aren't.

Well, OK, maybe at some point someone did this. There ain't no intelligence test to be a drug dealer. But adding a very expensive drug to a less expensive drug and then selling the result as if it was all the less expensive drug is not a good business model. Marijuana dipped in PCP costs more. (Though Dave doesn't need to know.)

The heroin-in-ecstasy thing may have arisen because there is a common practice of cutting relatively expensive MDMA with a relatively inexpensive amphetamine-family drug; the two go together pretty well, since straight MDMA has stimulant effects too. Then, if someone who's used to MDMA pills full of speed gets some that have little or no speed, they'll feel much less stimulated and say there must be some opiates in these new pills.

There's one more kind of drug adulterant, which I think reached its fullest flower in the Prohibition period in the USA. Once the drug you're selling becomes illegal no matter how much care you take in making it, you see, you might as well put any old crap in it, if it meets the above criteria of not being obvious or killing your customers too quickly. In Prohibition, this explained all of the booze with methanol, and worse, in it.

It's quite easy to make moonshine that has very little methanol in it. Hell, if you start with sugar and bread yeast and keep your equipment clean, your brew will never have any methanol in it at all.

But methanol gets you drunk just as good as ethanol. And during Prohibition, the kick a given bathtub gin had was one of its most important selling points. And ethanol is an antidote to methanol poisoning; it's amazing how long serious alcoholics can survive, and not even go blind, drinking contaminated booze, as long as the good alcohol significantly outweighs the bad.

Result: Methanol-contaminated booze, often deliberately made that way by cutting it with industrial wood alcohol. It was all over the damn place, making money for gangsters and slowly poisoning large numbers of people who just wanted to get peacefully drunk.

And it got even worse. There are other substances which, superficially, get you drunk. A chemical called tricresyl phosphate is one of them. Back in the Twenties, some geniuses figured this out, observed that exposure to modest amounts of tricresyl phosphate did not seem to cause people to drop dead, and started adulterating a patent medicine called Jamaica ginger with it.

Patent medicines loaded up with alcohol were a popular way to sneak around Prohibition, and the poorer end of the market, once again, naturally gravitated toward whatever cost the least and hit the hardest. Thanks to tricresyl phosphate, Jamaica ginger or "Jake" looked like a value winner.

And tens of thousands of people were, to a greater or lesser extent, crippled.

Hooray for prohibition!


Psycho Science is a regular feature here. Ask me your science questions, and I'll answer them. Probably.

And then commenters will, I hope, correct at least the most obvious flaws in my answer.